OPINION: Defining Poor Little Rich Girl's Historical Significance

Clearly defined criteria are used by public agencies to assess and determine the possibility that an old structure might also have broader historical significance. The same can apply in Perry Hall.

Given the recent public dialog regarding the future of the structure that used to house the Poor Little Rich Girl bridal shop in Perry Hall, I thought it might be helpful for readers to learn a little about how historical significance is actually defined.

While its demolition has been postponed, at least temporarily, even activists are skeptical that the former shop can be saved. It's the question of should it be saved that drags on. 

As it happens, there is a very specific process—used by the U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service—to assess the relative significance of older structures. A clear understanding of this methodology might make it easier for folks to understand the context of recent events associated with the structure in question.

Our nation has had laws for some time to ensure that properties of regional or national significance receive the attention and the protection they deserve. The Historic Sites Act of 1935 authorized the Secretary of the Interior to identify properties of national significance in United States history and archeology. The National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 expanded this recognition to properties of local and state significance in American history, architecture, archeology, engineering, and culture.

The National Register of Historic Places is our official listing of these recognized properties, and is maintained by the National Park Service. The National Register documents the appearance and importance of sites, buildings, and structures that are significant in our collective history. These properties, when looked at as a whole, represent the major patterns of America's shared local, state, and national experience.

The National Park Service utilizes the National Register Criteria for Evaluation in order to guide the selection of properties included in the inventory. These criteria are standards by which every property that is nominated to the National Register must be judged.  In order to be categorized as historically significant, and be added to the National Register, buildings must possess "integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association," and must be:

  1. "associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; or
  2. associated with the lives of significant persons in or past; or
  3. embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or
  4. have yielded or may be likely to yield, information important in history or prehistory."

The initial "integrity" qualifications have special significance in evaluating potential National Register additions.  According to the National Park Service, "integrity is the ability of a property to convey its significance." To retain historic integrity a property will necessarily possess several, and typically a large majority, of the seven elements. The retention of specific aspects of integrity is absolutely vital for a property to convey its significance to the public at-large.

The physical location of a historic property, complemented by its present-day setting, is particularly important in recapturing the sense of historic events and persons. Were one to evaluate the property located at 9010 Belair Road, challenges associated with these two measures of historical significance should be readily apparent. 

As a student of history myself, I would love to be able to preserve each and every aspect of our past history. However, I realize that priorities must be identified, and to save every old structure would simply be unrealistic. That is why we have the National Register process—to help identify those aspects of our shared history that are most significant, so that we can focus our energies on these most precious of our cultural resources.  In this age of limited private and public resources, we must use clearly defined methods to set our course for the future even as we seek to be mindful of the past.

Joseph Norman December 11, 2012 at 07:23 PM
Acts Like Summer: I am very interested in the place I call home, and have no issue in general with the process of community involvement. I do, however, disagree with the sentiment held by Mr. Patro and others that this particular dwelling is worth saving simply because it is old, but that does not mean I am someone who sits on the sidelines and expects others to solve problems for me. In fact, the opposite is true - I am very interested and that is why I was asking questions to determine just what the historical and/or architectural significance of this structure is so that I could form my own educated opinion of its value. I was simply engaging in the community conversation that Mr. Patro intended to start by taking in information and asking informed questions. The point I am trying to make is that just because I disagree with someone who labels himself as a community activist doesn't mean that I am against citizens being involved in their community or being hostile towards the idea, which Mr. Patro has suggested. It just means that in this particular instance I do not share his opinion, plain and simple. Disagreement is not the same as disrespect.
Gregg Roberts December 12, 2012 at 03:00 PM
Mark, For the record you are a community hero. Hero - -because there aren't many at all like you. So your distinction of honor is based on the apathy of the majority of the community in some part. You are right. At least we know more about the house now and maybe the new owners will put up a sign with a picture of the house that reads like the one at KFC ''This historic landmark was demolished in order to bring you this gas station. Welcome to Perry Hall.'' Or that picture could be posted at the Perry Hall Library's ''museum'' of portraits of buildings from Perry Hall knocked down. If it is any consolation to you, the buildings are gone at the same time the people with the old town spirit in Perry Hall are in large gone as well. I don't know you but I congratulate you and thank you for your defense of the historic Perry Hall.
Gregg Roberts December 12, 2012 at 03:01 PM
And another point in address to above comments and the article: Poor Little Rich Girl may not be our finest example of a historic building but it was one of the few left that has not already been demolished. Therefore the criteria has to be relaxed a bit.
Mark Patro December 12, 2012 at 03:03 PM
thanks Gregg
Heather Patti December 28, 2012 at 11:12 PM
Ronald Vos, I would very much welcome the opportunity to speak with you about your research of Perry Hall History, as I am an amateur local historian. Does anyone realize that George Washington DID spend many nights at The Red Lion Inn in WHITE MARSH? Does anyone know where it is? It was demolished years ago. My concern is that as time goes by and people forget, or newcomers never know, more buildings with historical value will be ruined. My family actually has roots to the Perry Hall Mansion, but I realize this is not the only structure worthy of attention.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »