.
Feedback

Poll: Driven to Distraction?

A bill introduced by Maryland lawmakers would make using a cell phone while driving a primary offense.

On Feb. 7, Baltimore County delegates James Malone (D) and A. Wade Kach (R) introduced a bill that would authorize police to pull over a driver speaking on a hand-held cell phone.

As the law is presently written, speaking on hand-held cell phone is a secondary offense, meaning that police can only issue a citation if they see another violation, the Baltimore Sun reported.

The new measure, if adopted into law, makes driving while using a hand-held cell phone a primary offense. Hands-free phone sets would still be legal, and the law makes an exception for calling 911 in an emergency.

Driving while using a cell phone is a primary offense in nine states and the District of Columbia, the Washington Post reported. Texting while driving is already a primary offense in Maryland.

Being distracted by portable digital devices dramatically increases the risk of driving, some experts claim, as much as drunk driving. According to a 2009 study by the Virginia Tech Transportation Institute, texting while driving increases the risk of collision by 23 times.

Texting and talking on the phone while driving is becoming increasingly common, particularly among young people, according to a recent study by State Farm. About 58 percent of all drivers admit talking on a cell phone while driving, and 32 percent say they text, the survey found.

However, among drivers 18-29 years old, 70 percent say they talk on a hand-held phone while driving and almost two-thirds admit to texting while driving, according to the insurance company.

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, in 2009 more than 5,000 people were killed and 450,000 injured in distracted driving crashes. NHTSA recommends a national ban on all digital devices while driving, even hands-free phones.

Is it time to treat driving while distracted more seriously?

JW Putney February 13, 2012 at 05:48 pm
Have seen too many 'almost' accidents as a pedestrain and as a driver.
Fortunately they were just 'almost' and it is extremely unfortunate when it actually happens. JW
Purple Elephant Politics February 13, 2012 at 07:18 pm
Del. Malone also has a piece of legislation in that would make it illegal to do anything while driving, eating, drinking, smoking, repositioning the rear view mirror, handing your kid a sippy cup...literally anything but keeping your hands at 10 and 2. At what point do we say, enough is enough? At what point do we draw the line on the extent to which Big Brother can tell us how to live our lives?
Jeff February 13, 2012 at 08:42 pm
When the TSA has check points set up and asks you for you papers ...it's too late ...your a commie now ..oh wait they do that for alcohol..don't they
Coming soon ....cell phone check points ...and how do the Marxist at large pay for all this ...to quote O'Malley 's famous 2010 TV spot ...".if it comes out of my pocket it's a tax..... A tax is a tax is a tax "
Jeff February 13, 2012 at 08:47 pm
Don't worry the congress just passed a law allowing the FAA 30,000 drones to watch your every move .....all of our liberties are being taken away for supposed "safety " and in the end we are NO safer and LESS free. and We pay for all of it
How about you teach your kids AND yourself some self discipline so they learn to be good drivers and citizens....or some liberal will take that right from you as well
Richard Hiteshew February 14, 2012 at 02:45 pm
How about shaving (hand held electric), putting on make-up, reading (yes I have seen that), yelling at the kids, arguing with your spouse, eating a donut, looking at the GPS, changing a radio station or CD, or any other form of not paying attention?
Where does it stop?
Jeff February 14, 2012 at 02:50 pm
It stops when you find yourself on a train like a sardine and living in Suburbia and rural America is a memory ...like in the Soviet Union ...It didn't die ...it is growing here under the cloaked liberal progressive commie agenda ....
Michael Ernest February 14, 2012 at 07:05 pm
When the use of a technological advance like cell phones proliferates to the extent that it leads to accidents, deaths and becomes a safety hazard to other drivers, it is clearly the time to take legislative action. Without cell phone use while driving being a primary offense, it will not be obeyed by those that feel they can get away with it. And frankly, from what I see even with it being a secondary offense-It is still largely ignored by habitual cell phone users and a heck of a lot more than you see with drivers eating, shaving, putting on makeup and so forth-thde commonly used weak argument against such legislation. While I have see such occurrences they are far less frequent than cell phone use even now with a secondary offense law on the books. I equate cell use while driving as the same as DWI and the penalties for causing an accident or death should be the same. Maybe with comparable penalties on the books that would make people think twice before practicing such irresponsible behavior. There will always be these comments about other forms of inattention, but it is a matter of the frequency at which cell phones have contributed to diminished safety compared to these other much less frequent and of lesser duration periods of inattention.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Catonsville Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Found Dog
Deena Dietrich June 19, 2013 at 01:21 pm
why did they take it to animal control???? they will kill him if no one comes for him in the nextRead More few days.
Stacy June 13, 2013 at 03:42 pm
Still no word?
John Taylor June 14, 2013 at 03:21 am
I'm checking with the other shifts to find out if there was a reunion of pet and owner. I hope toRead More have good news soon.
Janet Metzner (Editor) June 17, 2013 at 07:49 pm
From what I just heard after talking to a sergeant at the station, the owner has been found, orRead More animal control came to get the stray dog. He's not certain. @Cpl Taylor, were you able to find out? Thanks! -Janet
Sanchez June 7, 2013 at 03:16 pm
Hide that gun Annie before the hoplophobes in Annapolis take it from you!
Sanchez June 7, 2013 at 03:18 pm
Annie Oakley today would be banned form doing what she did and she would be slurred and slammed andRead More insulted by the hoplophobes. She would be forced into retirement and onto taxpayer funded benefits.
Sanchez June 1, 2013 at 02:20 pm
Will the City Government decide this group must post signs that state what work they do and don'tRead More do?
Sanchez June 3, 2013 at 05:21 pm
Oella Ave is one of the worse. Westchester Ave in areas look like they have not been paved forRead More decades.
Lorraine Doucette June 4, 2013 at 12:49 am
Why does the Ellicott City zip code go into Oella?
Steve Schreiner June 19, 2013 at 04:34 pm
My understanding is that Ellicott City was once (over 100 years ago) an incorporated township andRead More included Oella. Its post office included Oella and that portion within the now 21043 zip code.
Jim Opasik May 10, 2013 at 07:33 pm
The Husky "BLUE" has been reclaimed by it"s owner..........Happy Face for me :~)Read More Jim Opasik
BDineen January 20, 2013 at 04:21 am
Have u found Lemmy yet? We were at Patapsco (Sawmill/Santee Trail) today, saw the flyers but didn'tRead More see her around. So sorry to hear this. Is she chipped?