Beyond Belief in Bethlehem

God born in a manger? One can accept it on faith. “Just believe,” some say. But belief is high-maintenance. Is there a different way to approach the meaning of the season?

God born in a manger?  One can accept it on faith, I guess.  Anything is possible. Take the leap. “Just believe,” some say. 

But belief is high-maintenance.  Beliefs require defense, argument, protection, proof.  When we’re involved with the belligerent world of beliefs we’re often dealing with embattled egos, beliefs as extension of egos, beliefs as weapons for frightened egos.

The world has grown tired of beliefs.  The world knows the costly price of dogmatic assertions and fundamentalisms of every kind.  The world has lost faith in what the Church believes because it has failed to embody it – incarnate it, enflesh it – in its practice. 

I, too, have grown tired of beliefs.  Sounds odd coming from a preacher, right?  Perhaps. 

The first Jesus followers did not have a “belief system.” Jesus called people to follow him, which meant more than believing in him, more than simply confessing certain theological ideas about him, and certainly more than attempting an anemic ethical do-goodism (which often passes as “Christian” these days).  The first followers had an experience of the holy, an encounter with the divine, the numinous, and they participated in the power and grace and intensity of God’s Spirit unleashed upon the world in a new way, gospeling creation in the flesh, in a person, calling humanity to embark, like him, on a heroic journey of divine dimensions and cosmic proportions.  

That’s why the shepherds are my favorite characters in the Christmas story.  Their journey begins with an encounter on the outskirts of Bethlehem; they show us the way.

Luke’s description of what the shepherds underwent was something like a mystical experience, it was a meeting with mystery – and mystery, because it’s a mystery, not a puzzle (which can be solved), it’s not completely knowable.  It can’t be measured.  It can’t be analyzed.  It can’t be verified.  It can only be experienced. 

Despite the presence of stories like these in scripture, the Church has been suspicious of the mystical. Mystics were often repressed by the Church.  Cultural historian José Argüelles (1939-2011) sees a “dictatorship of reason” in the modern era of Western culture that “banished mysticism as a branch of the insane.”  

We need to acknowledge that there are other ways of knowing in addition to reason.  Albert Einstein (1879-1955) insisted that, “The most beautiful experience we can have is the mysterious.  It is the fundamental emotion which stands at the cradle of true art and true science.  Whoever does not know it and can no longer wonder, no longer marvel, is as good as dead.” The psychoanalyst Carl Jung (1875-1961) warned, “…only the mystic brings what is creative to religion itself….  The creative mystic was ever a cross for the Church, but it is to him [and her] that we owe what is best in humanity.”

What if we viewed the shepherds as mystics?  The King James Version says the shepherds, “were sore afraid” (Luke 2:9); the Greek behind the King’s English is stronger and means something like, “and they became afraid with very much great fear.”  They were terrified! Seized by a holy terror and awe. The Greek suggests language brought to its limits, incapable of expressing the holy fear, the terror that comes with encountering something mysterious. Yes, the angels replied, “Fear not,” but only after the initial experience.  This is what theologian Rudolph Otto (1869-1937) described as a mysterium tremendum et fascinans:  a terrifying and fascinating mystery that seizes us and overwhelms us in love.

The Jewish theologian Abraham Heschel (1907-1972) defined mysticism as “radical amazement.”  Wasn’t that Mary’s response to the shepherds’ experience?  Maybe she, too, was a mystic. “Awe is the beginning of wisdom,” Heschel claimed.  “Awe precedes faith.”  Not belief, not reason, but awe.  Radical awe. And praise, too, “precedes faith.” Awe is the beginning of wisdom.  The fear experienced in awe and terror “is not the fear of guilt” or of being attacked or judged by an angry God, but a feeling of WOW! – a reverential feeling rooted in the wonder of our existence, of our being included in the amazing twenty-billion-year drama that is the universe,  conscious that the Creator of this universe and the source of existence itself encounters us, overwhelms us with love, and faces us – literally – in the flesh, in the birth of a Son who came for us to know once and for all that we are deeply loved, that we are God’s beloved sons and daughters, the objects of God’s joy and passion.

So how does one respond to this kind of awe? What do we “do” with it?  We don’t “do” anything with it. It “does” us, and shapes us and loves us.  As the ancients knew, there is one proper response to mystery – to kneel.  The poet T. S. Eliot (1888-1965) told us in his Four Quartets, this is what the journey of life is about, this is what faith is about, this how we respond to the mystery of the Incarnation and every mystery we encounter; he said,

You are not here to verify,

Instruct yourself, inform curiosity

Or carry report.  You are here to kneel….


This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Aliza Worthington December 24, 2012 at 03:56 PM
This is beautiful, Ken. Bravo. It stirs the mysticism in even the most ardent realist (like me.)
Ken Kovacs December 24, 2012 at 04:10 PM
Thanks, Aliza! Peace!
Penny Riordan December 24, 2012 at 10:19 PM
Thanks for writing this, Ken! It really gets me thinking. I appreciate thinking about the difference between 'belief' and 'belief system.'
linda meyer December 25, 2012 at 01:24 AM
Wonderful, Ken. Linda Meyer
Ken Kovacs December 25, 2012 at 02:46 AM
Thanks, Linda. Merry Christmas!
NottinghamFamily December 25, 2012 at 03:07 PM
Maybe in your world, you have "grown tired of beliefs" and your personal system of thinking that "... belief is high-maintenance. Beliefs require defense, argument, protection, proof. When we’re involved with the belligerent world of beliefs we’re often dealing with embattled egos, beliefs as extension of egos, beliefs as weapons for frightened egos." I am not frightened, my ego is safe and intact and my beliefs are most certainly not weapons for frightened egos. My beliefs are born of a peaceful faith and as a lover of science and the realism of the universe, I also enjoy and subscribe to a deep faith and belief that all things must not have concrete evidence or proof. You also say that "The world has lost faith in what the Church believes because it has failed to embody it – incarnate it, enflesh it – in its practice. " I disagree completely. Many millions have not lost faith and it is stronger than ever in many. This "world" you speak of is finite and not as broad as you suggest. Thankfully, my church has done all the things you assert it has failed at doing. My church's practice is strong and reassuring and brings my community of believers exactly what we need when we need it, no photographic proof or DNA required. Merry Chris...I mean, have a enjoyable winter season.
NottinghamFamily December 26, 2012 at 12:06 AM
So, since I disagreed with the poster of this blog and my opinions differ, they weren't approved? I used well thought out statements, proper English and properly written sentences with no profanity or inappropriate statements of any kind. How interesting that the Patch allows the blocking of educated debate on its forums.
Ron Gunderson December 26, 2012 at 08:34 PM
Thank you for posting "Beyond Belief in Bethlehem" - encouraging deep thought into how we may humbly seek to be God's true instruments of peace in this troubled world.
Tim December 26, 2012 at 10:36 PM
Your posts are here, NF. Unless there were more? This entire forum system is fairly rudimentary, and ridden with bugs whenever 'updates' in the online software occur. As far as this discussion goes, the sheer concept of 'belief' is predicated on the scientifically unprovable. You can't actually defend - or fail to defend - a religious faith as NONE of them are completely provable - or disprovable.
FIFA December 27, 2012 at 02:47 AM
Of course, there is another side to the discussion. Which is Reason. With all due respect to the writer, what you and other "believers" choose to suggest is that there is an almighty Creator who requires our continual belief in his "loving". I suggest to you, that if there exists such a being that can create the universe, which is far beyond most humans comprehension as to what the "universe' really is, that demands or even wants our "love", that is not a "Creator" I would adore. No such powerful being would request or even seek our "love". I will not even ask you to answer the very simple question, who created the Creator? Please don't answer always was always will be or something similar. This posting is not meant to offend, only to have readers think deeply. Please do. I don't have answers, I just seek them.
FIFA December 27, 2012 at 02:55 AM
As per an earlier poster, what is the delay in posting comments? Please editor explain that. It is not beyond comprehension I believe.
Gregg Roberts December 29, 2012 at 11:37 PM
Beautiful piece here. I am sure that for the fundamentalist that beauty is lost. I especially enjoyed how you meshed a Jewish theologian's teachings with the Christmas story. FIFA -- God doesn't require your love. He seeks it. He offers it. He created you -- that in short is why He seeks it. No one created the Creator. That question is perplexing but not as perplexing as what caused the Big Bang / the world to come into existence ? Random chance? That takes a lot more faith then I can muster to believe in. The alternative? A Creator. I agree it's hard to fathom but it's the most fathomable of all explanations.
anon December 30, 2012 at 04:33 AM
I had trouble understanding the message of this article. Write from your heart and tell us what makes you believe. Help us look for signs that there is something to believe in. Jung, theologians, good for philosophy and theology class, but way over my head. http://gracegems.org/18/Ryle-%20Preaching.htm
FIFA December 31, 2012 at 10:20 PM
Gregg, not to argue with your premise. But you said how did the Big Bang happen but you accept on faith that nothing preceded your Creator. Do you not see the conundrum? I do not yet fully understand the Universe nor will I in my lifetime, but Christians used to think the world was flat too. Christians and other religions believe many things they no longer do, It took time and science to show them otherwise. We continue to grow exponentially in our understanding of the Universe, I believe we will just never know the full Universe because we will cause ourselves to no longer exist. It is the human way.
Tim January 02, 2013 at 06:38 AM
See, I think just the opposite. What makes you honestly think that this is the only civilization in the thousands and thousands of galaxies in the universe - places we can't even begin to explore? I find this to be logically far more practical then just one all powerful being pulling all the strings here in this (or multiple) locations in the universe. I don't completely discount the existence of a "Creator" or "God", of course. It's certainly a possibility. Nobody knows one way or the other, and by the time we find out yes or no, we're dead, so... not attempting to argue here, just throwing an alternative viewpoint that's all.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something