.

The Worthington Post - Suspension Notice

Still waiting to hear if Scientific American actually employs someone named Brian Eldridge, so that I can send my response directly to him. Haven't heard back, yet. Hmmm.

 

A few weeks ago, I received the following letter from Scientific American magazine.

"SUSPENSION NOTICE

TO:  Subscriber
FROM:  Brian Eldridge/Associate Publisher
RE:  Unpaid Invoice

After repeated unanswered billing efforts, we have been forced to suspend service of your subscription to Scientific American.  And we are now in the awkward position of asking you again to pay for the subscription you ordered.

So please take a moment now to pick up a pen and indicate your credit card payment information.  You may also write a check for the amount shown on the enclosed invoice.

Then return them together in the enclosed reply envelope.  Your subscription will resume upon receipt of payment, and you will receive the remainder of issues without penalty.

Brian Eldridge

P.S.  If something about your order is incorrect, PLEASE let us know.  We can quickly resolve any error or discrepancy -- but NOT unless we hear from you."

I responded thusly:

TO:  Brian Eldridge, Associate Publisher, Scientific American
FROM: Aliza Worthington, Errant Subscriber
RE: Unpaid invoice
DATE: January 7, 2013

Thank you for your SUSPENSION NOTICE.  You seem quite put out that we haven’t renewed our subscription, yet, and appear to be laboring under quite a few misconceptions.  Please allow me to disabuse you of these.

1.  I called to ask how many “repeated unanswered billing efforts” I’ve so callously and irresponsibly ignored.  Your customer service representative (Jasmine) was unable to give me that information, as it is not something of which you keep track.  Considering you and so many other of your print cousins begin sending out “urgent” renewal notices 3 or 4 months into a brand new year-long subscription, I hardly think I can be blamed for ignoring one or two.

2.  You seem to feel coerced into no longer sending us magazines (“we have been forced to suspend service of your subscription…”)  I think, perhaps, the tone is a bit Nora Desmond, don’t you?  All that has happened is that in September, I hadn’t sent you a renewal check, and you are now no longer sending me the magazine.  This is a standard business relationship, no?  I wasn’t aware I was awakening the Scientific American Drama Queen by waiting until January to catch up on my magazine subscriptions.

3.  I highly recommend therapy for your deeply passive-aggressive attitude.  “…we are now in the awkward position of asking you again to pay for the subscription you ordered.”  Actually, according to your phone representative, I did not send in a renewal form asking you to “bill me later”, so technically, I did not order anything.  You’re clearly resentful of that fact, and instead of asking me politely to reorder, or notifying me politely that the subscription is cancelled, you feel the need to blame me for putting you in an awkward position.  Dear me, how over-sensitive and angry you must be!  Really, again, I can’t tell how how effective talk-therapy can be for someone with such issues.

4.  “So please take a moment now to pick up a pen and indicate your credit card payment information.”  This is the business version of saying to your family members, “Would it KILL YOU to PICK UP THE PHONE and call me once in a while???”  Interpreted another way, it could be the teacher saying to the student, “Is it THAT DIFFICULT for you to find your pen and write down sixteen digits, you moron?”   Thank you, but I already suffer from plenty of guilt and self-doubt, so forgive me if I don’t allow your tone to add to my burden.

5.  As I am continuing my subscription (my husband really enjoys the magazine) I am so relieved to discover that once you receive my payment, my subscription will resume, and that I will “receive the remainder of issues without penalty.”  How I could be penalized for legally allowing a magazine subscription to lapse is a mystery to me.  If you chose to not renew it at the discounted price I received last year because I didn’t not renew in a timely fashion, I’d just consider that the price of doing business, not a penalty.  I’m a grown-up like that.

Thank you for your time, and I certainly hope this has cleared up any misunderstanding you may have about our relationship, and your ability to shame, guilt, or intimidate me in any manner whatsoever.

 

Aliza Worthington

This post available in its original form on my blog, The Worthington Post.

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Sandy January 28, 2013 at 07:13 PM
The wording "we are now in an awkward position of asking you again to pay for the subscription you ordered" seems to imply that you never paid for the issues you already received. If that's indeed the case, then the magazine has a point (though I don't agree with their arrogant tone.) Now, if this is their way of guilting you into renewing, that's classless.
edb January 28, 2013 at 07:57 PM
Reader's digest does a similar thing (although without the snarky letter). They start sending renewal notices for the next year shortly after you get your 1st issue. By the time your real renewal comes around, you are so confused that you can't remember when you renewed and at what price. Every month a statement comes with a different renewal fee. You would think they would just send out one renewal notice right before the yearly billing cycle ends and save on the postage.
Aliza Worthington January 28, 2013 at 08:46 PM
Well, I asked the phone rep at least 3 different times in 3 different ways if I had requested a renewal I hadn't paid for, been sent an invoice that was unpaid, or owed them money for any issues whatsoever. Each time, the answer was "no." :-/
Aliza Worthington January 28, 2013 at 08:47 PM
Thanks, Bruce - you hit the nail on the head. It was so condescending I literally laughed. :)
Aliza Worthington January 28, 2013 at 08:48 PM
Consumer Reports is notorious for this, as well! I NEVER know when the subscription actually ends. It's in the fine print somewhere of the renewal notices, but it is a pain to get so many, and I agree - a waste of money and paper on their parts!

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »