Recently, Patch editors surveyed coaches and athletic trainers from across the Baltimore-D.C. region on whether they kept AEDs--Automatic External Defibrillators—at every school-sponsored athletic event.
The results were mixed. Some districts, such as Montgomery and Prince George’s counties, said they kept AEDs at every school event. Other districts, such as Howard and Carroll counties, said they were unable to have the devices on each athletic field.
“It’s not practical,” said Mike Williams, coordinator of athletics for the Howard County Public School System. “You know, it’d be ideal to have a designated AED at every game, but you could have a game in the stadium, a game in the gym, in the field hockey field...”
State regulations say that at a minimum, there must be one AED in each public high school, which needs to be “available” for use at school-sponsored athletic events. The regulations don’t explicitly require the devices at all school-sponsored events.
The movement to put AEDs, which districts said cost about $2,000 each, in schools and on sports fields has advanced in recent years, as incidents of sudden cardiac arrest among teens playing sports makes national headlines.
Most recently, Breanna Sudano a player from the visiting Perry Hall High School girls field hockey team collapsed after walking off the field at Catonsville High School. She survived with the intervention of CPR, but the school’s four AEDs were at the school, and not on the field at the time of the incident.
David Monroe, medical director of The Children’s Care Center at Howard County General Hospital, said about one in 200,000 children are at risk for sudden cardiac arrest. Incidents are higher during times of exertion, such as sporting events.
AEDs boost survival rates during such events, Monroe said. With each minute without the intervention from an AED, the chances of the person’s survival plunge 10 percent, he said. After 10 minutes, the AED doesn’t do much good, he said.
Weigh in on our poll and in comments: Should AEDs be required at every school-sponsored athletic event?
chsmm1
2:20 pm on Monday, November 14, 2011
Absolutely!!!
Jim Arndt
4:20 pm on Monday, November 14, 2011
Yes, they should be required at every public gathering within 1 minute reach.
Michele Snyder
8:35 pm on Monday, November 14, 2011
Three years ago my 17 year old seemingly healthy daughter collapsed on the soccer field. She had a sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) and died instantly. There was no AED available, that would have been her only chance.
Each year thousands of youth, both athletes and non-athletes, suffer sudden cardiac arrests. For many, death is the first symptom.
AEDs should be available everywhere youth congregate, including sporting events, recreation centers, tournaments, dances and more. We insist our kids wear helmets, and pads, yet we let them participate in activities without an AED around.
Learn more at www.parentheartwatch.org.
Genia Crews
11:13 pm on Monday, November 14, 2011
As an EMT who works numerous student sports events, I think it is very important to follow through with th is issue. AED's are so user friendly and really can make the difference between life and death. Too many kids have gone down with undiagnosed cardiac issues and might have been saved or had a better chance of survival if an AED had been available. I DO have an AED with me on the field at all times. You can never predict an arrest, but you sure can be prepared to respond when it happens!!! I have a hard time digesting the budget being more important than a child/students life!
PastorLorenzo Epps
11:06 am on Tuesday, November 15, 2011
YES! too many athletes dropping on fields and courts....also...the population is grossly overweight and highly stressed....lets be ready!
Mark Lundin
7:07 pm on Monday, November 28, 2011
Howard Co. Police Cruisers Get New, Life-Saving Equipment (AEDs)
http://baltimore.cbslocal.com/2011/11/27/hoco-police-cruisers-get-new-equipment/?src=fb
Ohai
12:18 pm on Tuesday, November 29, 2011
If these kids are that out of shape, they should not be playing sports. Have their parents pay for a phyiscal prior to the students sports participation.
Mark Lundin
12:36 pm on Tuesday, November 29, 2011
Ohai, sudden cardiac arrest can and does strike even the most top-tier in shape athletes. It is most often the result of an undiagnosed heart condition. There are countless articles on this topic, but here is recent one that came up at the top of my search results.
Few Docs Follow Heart Attack Guidelines for Student Athletes. Fewer than 6 percent of doctors fully follow national guidelines for assessing sudden cardiac death risk during high school sports physicals.
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/docs-follow-sudden-cardiac-arrest-guidelines-athletes/story?id=14935667#.TtUWwValO8o
Ohai
2:03 pm on Tuesday, November 29, 2011
Mark, cardiac arrest in student athletes is extremely rare and these devices are +$2,000 each. If parents are that concerned about their kids, I suggest they find a proper doctor or finance the cost of these devices themselves (perhaps through a fee to participate in county sports programs). We can't spend tens of thousands of dollars to eliminate the most unlikely risks.
chsmm1
2:42 pm on Tuesday, November 29, 2011
Ohai,
Here is a website so you can educate yourself on SCA. http://www.parentheartwatch.org/IntheNews.aspx SCA is more frequent then is reported, check out a few of the articles from this website. I think you will be surprised. Also AEDS (these lifesaving devices) are not expensive. the price ranges from 1,000 -2,000 depending on how advanced the person that will be using is needed. If hundreds of thousands of dollars are used to build turf fields through out MD at HS, then 1,000$ is nothing. AEDS are everywhere now. Walk through your Mall, airport, on airplanes, neighborhood school, church, and government buildings, AEDS are hanging on the wall. All HS athletes are required to have an annual physical before they can play sports and most HS athletes are not over weight and are in good physical shape or they wouldn't make their HS team. Also, its a state law that all schools have AEDS and that they are accessible to the HS playing fields.
Ohai
3:07 pm on Tuesday, November 29, 2011
You are completely missing my point. My point is that SCA is rare (you will admit that if you're honest with yourself) and these devices are extremely expensive (note that whenever you see these devices in public, an alarm will sound if they are removed from the case). If parents really think this is a good use of money, please pool your funds with other parents and purchase an AED for your school. As I said before, don't look to taxpayers to spend tens of thousands of dollars to eliminate the most unlikely risks for your child.
chsmm1
2:43 pm on Tuesday, November 29, 2011
Here is a recent SCA local event that took place at CHS about 9 weeks ago on Sept. 27th. I encourage to read this article: http://www.baltimoresun.com/explore/baltimorecounty/sports/ph-ca-field-hockey-miracle-1005pp-20111017,0,1051389.story
So, do you want to tell this family that and AED was to expensive to save their child???
Ohai
3:17 pm on Tuesday, November 29, 2011
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it appears the life of this child was saved with CPR. There was no AED on the scene. I don't understand how you think this supports your case.
chsmm1
2:53 pm on Tuesday, November 29, 2011
here is the complete article from Sept. 27th at Catonsville High School:
http://www.baltimoresun.com/explore/baltimorecounty/neighborhoods/catonsville/ph-ca-medical-response-1005-20111001,0,4669015.story
Penny Riordan
4:54 pm on Tuesday, November 29, 2011
We also covered that issue here at Patch extensively, which was the reason for this poll. Here are the article: http://catonsville.patch.com/articles/aeds-on-athletic-fields-not-always-practical-coaches-say and then here: http://catonsville.patch.com/articles/high-praise-for-catonsville-high-bystander-response-in-girls-emergency
chsmm1
6:09 pm on Tuesday, November 29, 2011
I was at the CHS field when this child collapsed and CPR was done for 10 plus minutes and when the AED was placed on the child, she was in a shock-able rhythm and she was shocked and the AED ultimately saved her life. Just doing CPR alone would have not saved her life...get your facts straight and read the entire article. Obviously, you have no medical training and do not understand that for every minute someone is in a life threatening rhythm your chances of survival go done by 10%. So, if 6 minutes go by in a life threatening rhythm, chances of survival are 40%. Maybe you like those chances for your children, but not me. I think if you had witnessed this SCA event, you would have a greater appreciation for AEDS & CPR training and how important they are. Part of the controversy was the ambulance took over 10+ minutes to arrive to the field.
Ohai
6:41 pm on Tuesday, November 29, 2011
Oh, thanks, I didn't realize an AED was used. But the AED was delivered by medical personnel in response to the emergency 911 call. Isn't that exactly what's supposed to happen?
chsmm1
6:13 pm on Tuesday, November 29, 2011
Also, I would rather have my tax $ pay for life saving devices then an new turf field that cost tax payers hundreds of thousands of dollars. Also, MD state law (2006) requires schools to have AEDS, so to bad... your tax money has already been spent on these unnecessary lifesaving devices according to you. I guess we should NOT have fire alarms or fire extinguishers in the schools as well because school fires are a RARE occurrence. Maybe us parents should have school fund raisers to purchase fire extinguishers in accordance to your ridiculous thinking.
I understand your point, but your missing the bigger picture. It doesn't have to be an athlete on the field, it could be anyone in attendance at the game, fans, aunts, uncles, elderly grandparents, parents, referees, and coaches.
Ohai
6:46 pm on Tuesday, November 29, 2011
We don't need AEDs or artificial turf fields. And schools do have AEDs, so the law is being followed. You are asking for MORE AEDs if I understand you.
Fire alarms and fire extinguishers are great examples of safety devices that are cost effective. I have both in my house. I don't have an AED, because it is not cost effective. Nice try, but you're out.
chsmm1
6:38 pm on Tuesday, November 29, 2011
Your argument that SCA is a rare occurrence is a poor argument. According to the AHA (American Heart Association), About every 34 seconds, someone in the United States has a myocardial infarction (heart attack) which could lead to cardiac arrest.
Ohai
6:49 pm on Tuesday, November 29, 2011
And how many of those happen on a football field? Bueller? Bueller? I am not saying we shouldn't have AEDs on ambulances, I am saying we don't need them on football fields.
chsmm1
7:09 pm on Tuesday, November 29, 2011
The MD law also says that AEDS must be accessible from HS athletic fields and athletic events. So, your point is meaningless. The reason for having an AED at the field is obvious. The reason the whole article was written was because the AED was not accessible to the field at CHS. I don't have stats for MI's at football games, but every 34 seconds seems frequent enough for me.
Also, the reason Mall AEDS have alarms is not for preventing people from stealing them, its to alert Mall security that an emergency is occurring, so EMS can be alerted. The AEDS are not locked up...
You think that having fire alarms installed at schools are cheap, I'm not sure what the cost, but I'm sure is not pennies.
Ohai
7:57 pm on Tuesday, November 29, 2011
Hello, one every 34 seconds includes old people and coke-heads. Applying that statistic to school aged kids is a fallacy. But hey, can you just bring your AED to some of the games and save taxpayers some money? You do have one at your house, right? Goose, gander?
Obviously the AEDs at the mall are not locked up, but the alarm doubles as a theft device. Those things are expensive and that is not in dispute.
chsmm1
9:13 pm on Tuesday, November 29, 2011
First of all, who do you think attends these games... parents and elderly grandparents. You don't have a clue about heart disease and the population.. its clear with your ignorant answers.
Anyone can buy an AED for home use from the internet and I heard you can purchase one from Costco. In fact a coworker of mine has one in her car because her kids play sports. Also, anyone with any type of brain can use an AED ( they are idiot proof). They have done a study where 6th graders who knows nothing about them were able to use them effectively, but that excludes you of course because you would sit by an not use one because they are to expensive.
If someone wanted to steal an AED from the Mall, they could do it easily even with alarm. They could walk right out the door with the AED in hand and nobody would stop them.
What it boils down to is you think the life of a child or anybody else is not worth a 1,000$ investment. How sad for you, from your responses I guessing you don't have children.
Ohai
9:36 pm on Tuesday, November 29, 2011
Don't you dare tell me I am ignorant about heart disease just because I disagree with you. I have an extremely close relative with an LVAD. So screw you, seriously. Also, I am a former EMT at one of the volunteer HoCo stations who has had training on AEDs, thanks. And I've actually done CPR on people, so bug off for calling"ignorant". You never did answer my question about whether or not you have one. Why don't you answer that? Huh? Gonna go steal one from the mall first? I'll wait.
chsmm1
9:47 pm on Tuesday, November 29, 2011
Thank goodness your a former EMT... I have 20 years plus cardiac medical experience. I have taken care of people with LVADS, done CPR, and used defibrillators. No, i don't have an home AED, but I'm thinking about buying one because I can afford one.
Why don't you answer the ? the life of a child or save 1,000$. Obviously, you don't have children and seriously doubt your a former EMT.
Ohai
10:06 pm on Tuesday, November 29, 2011
You doubt I'm a former EMT? You're an idiot. The Life of a person is worth more than $1,000. But that has nothing to do with AEDs. How many of the AEds at schools have ever been used? Get a clue.
chsmm1
10:13 pm on Tuesday, November 29, 2011
I guess you didn't visit the parent heart watch website, there are many stories of school AEDS being used. So, if a child life is worth a 1,000$.. then why are you so opposed to AEDS. I'm sorry that you have a relative that has an LVAD.
Ohai
10:40 pm on Tuesday, November 29, 2011
I didn't realize men or women of science were so wooed by internet anecdotes. What % of the AEDs have been used at schools? Less than 1%? And how much was spent on them?