patching...
Breaking: Longshot Oxbow Wins Preakness Stakes »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Baltimore County Councilman Todd Huff Charged With DUI

The freshman Republican councilman was arrested early Saturday in Towson.

 

UPDATED (4:44 p.m.)—Baltimore County Councilman Todd Huff was charged early Saturday with driving under the influence of alcohol.

Huff, a freshman Republican who represents the 3rd Council District, was arrested around 3 a.m. in Towson, according to police spokesman Shawn Vinson.

Huff was stopped by police after his silver Jeep Grand Cherokee was spotted traveling northbound on York Road near Washington Avenue. The vehicle's headlights were off.

According to a statement of charges, Huff ran a red light at the intersection of York and Bosley. When the light turned green, the police officer turned on his emergency lights to signal Huff to pull over.

Huff pulled his county-owned vehicle into the Brooks Huff Tire Center, which is owned by his family, police said.

"Don't you know who I am?" Huff asked the officer, according to a statement of charges released to Patch. "You stopped me on my own property." [The statement of charges is attached to this story.]

The officer noted in the statement of charges that Huff smelled of alcohol and his speech was slurred and his eyes had a glassy appearance.

Huff failed three field sobriety tests, according to the statement.

At several points he asked officers if they "really need to be doing this."

"You need to take me home and be done with this," police quote Huff in the charging documents. "You can just drive me home I will leave the car parked here."

Police also reported observing Huff using his car to steady himself and that he stumbled several times when asked to complete a walking test.

Huff then said he was going to call Baltimore County Police Chief Jim Johnson, according to the police statement. The statement goes on to say that the call was not answered but Huff left a voicemail message saying he had been pulled over for driving without his headlights on and "had had a couple of drinks." 

The councilman then asked several officers if he should take the breath test, according to police. The officers advised him that he could speak to an attorney if he wished. Huff declined, saying he didn't like attorneys, according to the report.

Vinson said Huff was arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol and an intoximeter test was performed to measure his alcohol level.

According to a statement of charges, Huff's test showed .20 grams of alcohol per 210 liters of breath or the equivalent of a .20 blood alcohol level, according to police sources.

That level would be in excess of twice the legal blood alcohol limit in Maryland.

Huff, who represents Timonium and northern Baltimore County, was later released after being issued citations, Vinson said.

Huff did not answer his phone when called by a reporter for comment Saturday morning.

John Fiastro, chairman of the Baltimore County Republican Central Committee, said the party "does not condone such behavior regardless of party affiliation."

"I have reached out to the councilman, but have not talked with him yet," Fiastro said in a text message statement sent to Patch. "The committee will have questions and the councilman should be prepared with answers."

County Council Chairman Tom Quirk Saturday declined to comment on the arrest and called it "a personal matter."

He declined to comment on whether Huff would be asked to give up his county vehicle.

Court records and documents of expunged court cases show that Huff, 44, had three cases against him, including one for leaving the scene of an accident in Anne Arundel County, one for having a gun in his car and a third for passing a $500 bad check, according to a story reported in October 2010 when Huff was seeking office.

He was sentenced to one year in jail in 1995 for leaving the scene of an accident—a misdemeanor—with all but four days suspended. It is unclear how much time Huff actually served in the Anne Arundel County Detention Center.

Also in 1995, Huff received probation before judgment after he was pulled over for speeding. Huff said he told the traffic officer "out of courtesy" that he had a loaded Sig Sauer .380 caliber handgun in his glove box.

In a 2010 interview, Huff said those charges were in the past and were not relevant to his campaign.

"These were 15 years ago and a lot of things have changed," Huff said. "I've grown from my past. I'd like to be judged for what I am now and what I've accomplished."

For more county and state political coverage, follow Bryan P. Sears on Facebook and Twitter.

Related Topics: Bryan Sears, Todd Huff, and insider politics

John L.

10:59 am on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Aw shucks, another drunk on the Council? We certainly have a way of electing 'winners' don't we?

Reply
Comment_arrow

GD

9:52 am on Sunday, February 24, 2013

And the arrogance of this guy. Using his influence to call the the Police Chief to try to get himself out of this arrest. I hope Jim Johnson ensures he is not treated any differently than any of us would be treated. Great job by the local policeman that stopped him and treated him like any other citizen.

Comment_arrow

Steve Duvall

10:06 am on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Maybe he looked at the budget

Comment_arrow

Tom

6:46 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Well Well Well Now, Let's not be hasty. Leave the drunk politician on the street with a potential 3500lb weapon to kill and maim.... But take away the RIGHT to bear arms and defend yourself as a LAW ABIDING CITZEN. What do you think the Councils next move will be.

Comment_arrow

Ed

6:54 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Tom, can you please explain the point of your post? The county council has no standing regarding his driver's license; that is up to the courts and the DMV. The gun laws here are a function of state and federal government, NOT the county. So what move do you want the council to make? Also, the posts on here are overwhelmingly anti-Huff, so I don't see where too many folks are saying not to be hasty.

Bob Scheufele

11:01 am on Saturday, February 23, 2013

In "real life" driving a Company-owned vehicle under the influence is a terminable offence. I wonder what the County will do? Maybe downgrade to a Ford Fiesta?

Reply
Comment_arrow

John

12:08 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Give him a bike or scooter, maybe.

Comment_arrow

james smith

12:20 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

The county will probably do nothing. The voters will probably promote him to a seat in the US Congress.

Comment_arrow

Bill Fliegel

1:30 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

Mr Huff ,while acting as an elected representative of the residents of his district ,abused a County resource for unlawful purposes and, as such, a resignation is expected.

Gabriel Anthony

11:02 am on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Does not matter if you are republican or democrat he must go. Drinking and driving should no be accepted by leaders of this county. Does not matter if its a tax payer vehicle or not, drinking and driving proves he is not fit for the job and he must go.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ann Miller

3:01 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Other Tim, aren't all now DUIs - I think DWI no longer exists. Maybe someone else could answer that.

Comment_arrow

Steve

3:17 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

DUI is the worst of the two to be charged with. DWI has the lesser penalty.

http://www.mikerothman.com/blog/dui-vs-dwi/

Comment_arrow

Tim

6:17 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Other Tim: Yeah, when I grew up in Virginia, that's how it was as well.

Valerie B

11:04 am on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Will most likely be a slap on the wrist for him.

Reply

Buck Harmon

11:05 am on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Will his mug shot make the Patch Metro Rouges Gallery...or will he get a pass..?

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Bryan P. Sears

12:56 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

The mug shot was requested this morning when we first called about the incident.

Quipdude

11:07 am on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Citations? That's it??? Were it one of his constituents, his or her life would be ruined. Oh the glory of political office...

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kelleyand Terry Bates

11:20 am on Saturday, February 23, 2013

I could not agree more with "Quipdude". I say, Get this "bumb" out of office. I drank for a while to excess, I will admit this. But I would NEVER have put my self in a position of public office or serving the public in any way. I have 9 yrs, behind me now without a drop. I can tell you that a sober mind thinks much differently than a drunk mind.

Comment_arrow

Matt

9:28 am on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Yes, citations. These were TRAFFIC OFFENSES after all. What else did you want?

Lori Chrest

11:12 am on Saturday, February 23, 2013

To all making the comments above - Do any of you drink and drive?

Reply
Comment_arrow

moe green

11:35 am on Saturday, February 23, 2013

not anymore. just defending a DWI is expensive.

when i was much younger and on the job all often. but in those days if a police was stopped by another police he got a pass. now adays the new generation will write anyone.

Comment_arrow

Al Day

11:41 am on Saturday, February 23, 2013

I do not any longer do that since the 80's when the dui laws went into effect. At one time it was not a crime, but now is a high sin. I'd advise anyone who operates a vehicle to refrain at all cost from driving while drinking. The cost is just too high.

Comment_arrow

Al Day

11:47 am on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Back in the 70's whenI worked for the county my boss drove his county owned car into the guard rail on the beltway near where they built the road out to Carrol County (not sure of the rte number). And another into a phone poll out in front of the building maintenance shop in Timonium. He drank all the time (alcoholic I think) but was politically connected and never got into trouble. I happened to be in the car during the guard rail incident and in the shop when he hit the pole out front while talking to us on his 2 way radio. Those were the days. A guy could rise to high position in the county, drink all day and night and wreck county cars without a ding on his record at all. I could tell you plenty more about my time at the county gov. I could probably write a book in fact.

Comment_arrow

John

1:13 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

I don't. I also keep my cell phone in my pocket while I'm behind the wheel. When you're driving that's where 100% of your focus needs to be.

Comment_arrow

Needaname

1:16 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

A lot of people drive AFTER drinking - in Mr Huff's case, he got busted !

Comment_arrow

Needaname

1:25 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

BY NOW - every adult out there knows it is a crap shoot if you have over indulged or not. With that being said, do not drink and drive. Mr Huff's Jeep should be confiscated immediately just to save the county from any liability in case, God forbid, he makes the same mistake and has an accident. In the meantime, he can afford to pay for his own car and gas.

Comment_arrow

Retired

1:43 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

There are an awful lot of uninformed comments here. Police can charge you after blowing a .04. If a 150 lb woman has had two beers in under an hour then gets behind the wheel, she can and likely will be charged with DWI and likely a DUI. For a 230 lb man that's about 3 1/2 beers in an hour. And we're talking regular beers, not the high volume craft beers. Be careful out there.

The reason .08 is used is because that's the per se limit, or point at which studies indicate all drivers will face some form of impairment when operating a vehicle or heavy machinery. Below that the effects taper off, and in some people are not noticeable. That's why they have to perform field sobriety tests and why many duis and dwis are challenged in court.

Comment_arrow

DaughterOfAKing

7:54 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

I agree with Lori. While I don't drink, you can't tell me others are not guilty of it. They just never got caught. Mankind is fallible. We all make mistakes and poor errors in judgment. Not one of us is perfect. This man will have to reap the consequences. However, there is no reason to bad mouth anybody because this could easily be any one of you or any of your own child on that one bad day.

Comment_arrow

AzureSkye

8:55 am on Sunday, February 24, 2013

My exact thoughts too Lori. No one here has ever gone to a party, wedding , dinner and not had a glass of wine, beer or mixed drink...then gotten behind the wheel ? Don't expect an honest reply.

Comment_arrow

Ed

6:59 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Lori and azure, the guy blew a .20. That's not having one too many at a restaurant, a wedding or a bull roast. That's over twice the legal limit. (Wish there was a prompt that required people to think before hitting the enter key.)

Comment_arrow

DaughterOfAKing

12:38 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

@Ed What does it matter if someone is once, twice, or even three times over the legal limit. The fact is that they are over. An accident can happen to anyone who drinks 1 shot, 1/2 a glass of wine, or even 10 beers. Everyone has a different tolerance level. Being buzzed is still being drunk.

David F. Mister

11:20 am on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Everyone is entitled to the presumption of innocence and a fair and impartial trial. Even those that hold public office.
I think you would want the same for your spouse, child or friend.
David Mister

Reply
Comment_arrow

moe green

11:36 am on Saturday, February 23, 2013

mister,
trolling for clients?

Comment_arrow

John

1:15 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

If he's innocent, why not release the results of the intoximeter and prove that he wasn't under the influence or intoxicated? I'm sure his legal team has a copy of the police report. The fact that it's a big secret only shouts that he's guilty.

Comment_arrow

Needaname

1:28 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

moe green - I was thinking the same thing. ~

Comment_arrow

Retired

1:46 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

John, a copy of the police report from what's less than 12 hours ago? I would doubt it. By Monday morning, he would have the results. The problem with releasing the police report is the report may have commentary that is disputed in court. Frequently the FSTs are challenged because the officer incorrectly performed them or incorrectly recorded them (remember, the officer is also working at 3am and we're all human).

I would give the man and the officer the benefit of the doubt until the facts have been sorted out in court.

Comment_arrow

Jim Arrington

11:40 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

We know who you are Dave lawyer boy.

moe green

11:33 am on Saturday, February 23, 2013

a silver jeep grand cherokee? what is that a $30,000 vehicle? for a part time job?
plus heath care insurance and $50,000 a year.

a whore like the rest of them.

as for getting rid of him, that is for the voters to decide. i woukd rather have a tdrunk republican than a tea tottleing democrap antytime.

Reply
Comment_arrow

ZIG

4:22 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Shame on you for that ignorant statement. We do not want any drunks on the road. They are killers. Throwing politics into this is pathetic.

Bob Vaughan

11:33 am on Saturday, February 23, 2013

I would like to see The Patches, once a week, publish a list of all DUI citations issued by each local jurisdiction. Many small town newspapers do this, and it is a great way to embarrass folks into driving more carefully!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Al Day

11:50 am on Saturday, February 23, 2013

It wouldn't work. If putting people in jail (and that's what happens) doesn't work nothing will. It's a real disease with real victims, both those who drink and who they hurt.

Comment_arrow

Retired

1:47 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

You can pull up court records on Maryland Court Case Search. However, you will find out many of your friends and neighbors have made a mistake at some point in their lives be it financial, relationship, or otherwise. And then it becomes throwing stones at a glass house.

Thomas Davies

11:37 am on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Why does a county councilman need a county vehicle anyway. Are these people not supposed to be public servants? And pretty well paid ones too. What to they have to do that requires the county to provide them with vehicles?

Thomas Davies

Reply
Comment_arrow

Al Day

11:53 am on Saturday, February 23, 2013

There is a need for use of a vehicle during county business, but at 3am? I hope he has a very good excuse. Otherwise he should just resign. As far as the drinking and driving, there is no excuse. No one is above the law. What happens in this case may set a new standard in the county for use/misuse of county assets.

Al Day

11:38 am on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Why was he using a county vehicle at 3am? How is that allowed? I worked for the county and my boss wrecked 2 county cars in less than a year while drinking and driving, one time with me and other emplyees in the car. Seems things never change.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Retired

1:50 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

In you case, why did you get into a vehicle with someone you knew had been drinking or driving? That doesn't seem very wise. And as a county employee, you have a duty to the citizens to report a criminal act in progress less they be in your boss' line of fire (driving). If it's perfectly reasonable to say I'm not driving with you to a drunk boss and ask for his or hey keys. If they refuse, it's also reasonable to say I'm going to call the police because we have all sworn an oath to work for the citizens and this will endanger them.

Trish

11:47 am on Saturday, February 23, 2013

And for the record, his personal life. Doesn't have anything to do with what he does for the county... As long as he's doin his job as our concil man. It shouldn't be a issue what he's done or what he does on his personal time.

Reply
Comment_arrow

ddbs00

5:26 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

I kind of think public servants should hold themselves to a higher standard because of the trust they've been given as our representatives. Crazy way to think, I know.

Comment_arrow

thomas collins

7:18 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

it does when hes using a county car paid for by tax payers get your head out of your ass women sounds like your an achoilc also

Comment_arrow

Parkvillehoney

10:14 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Sorry Trish, the taxpayers of Baltimore County do have a say. Since he is driving a Baltimore County vehicle at 3AM drunk and Baltimore County taxpayers pay his salary and pay for his vehicle, we DO have a say. Todd Huff will not get my vote the next time around.

Al Day

11:57 am on Saturday, February 23, 2013

The county used to offer green beer at the county office building (COB) on St Patricks Day celebrations there. I don't know if that's allowed anymore. I haven't worked for the county for many a year but back in the day it was a party atmosphere.

Reply

Dennis Gilpin

11:57 am on Saturday, February 23, 2013

The police did exactly what they were supposed to do. Arrest him and release him for trial. Regardless of their position in the county, he has to be brought before a judge to to face his fate. As far as him driving a county vehicle "that time of night" (under those circumstances ) that issue will certainly be brought up. Seems there was a lack of judgement that will certainly cost him.

Reply

John

12:11 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Who holds the insurance for the county owned car? Who is responsible for any damage or death caused when someone is driving a county owned car? No, it didn't happen this time but with drunk drivers it's just a matter of time.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Bryan P. Sears

12:58 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

The county is self-insured which means taxpayers are ultimately liable.

jack friese

12:19 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

This is certainly preposterous. A council person in a $30,000 county owned vehicle, at three a.m., driving drunk (allegedly). Why do taxpayers have to provide vehicles to part time, very part time county workers in the first place? Then keep in mind there are seven council members driving around in vehicles paid for by the taxpayers. How much does all of this cost annually? And how many other employees have this benefit? And how much does this folly cost taxpayers?

We should get a listing from Kamenetz's office of every county employee who has a state owed vehicle, a lap top computer, a private wi fi device, a cell phone and similar things that we the taxpayer and private citizen is paying for. How much does all this cost taxpayers?

If Kamenetz's office does not provide this information, all concerned citizens should file a PIA request and demand this data.

It is no wonder that this State, County and Baltimore City is damn near bankrupt. We cannot afford such luxuries and even if we could, why should taxpayers foot the bill for such things? It is irresponsible and makes no sense.

Reply
Comment_arrow

james smith

12:34 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Excellent post with some good questions. I think that when a County councilman makes $50,000 for a part timme job, he/she should be able to provide for their own transportation needs. It is not like they have long distance driving to do. All of their driving will be to council meetings in Towson, and to meetings nearby in their district.

Comment_arrow

Ed

11:36 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Jack, why would county employees be driving around in state-owned vehicles?

Mike Toohey

12:22 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

why does he get a county vehicle?

Reply
Comment_arrow

dan ricci

12:30 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

All the county councilmen/women get a free county car (free to them, we pay for it). Some of them even have had several accidents with our cars. I think they should drive their own cars.

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Bryan P. Sears

1:00 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Technically, Dan, It's not free. The members do have to pay a fee to the county for the car to cover personal mileage and the maintenance.

dan ricci

12:25 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Our county car (its not his), should be taken away immediately.

Reply

jack friese

12:39 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

In reading this article again, it is interesting to read that Tom Quirk, the council chairman had no opinion, dismissing this abhorrent behavior as a personal matter for Todd Huff. Mr. Quick, you should have an opinion as behavior such as this places the County at terrible and needless risk. What would happen if there was some sort of tragedy. The County has its neck stuck out miles.

This still does not answer the question, why do you and the other council people need a County Owned vehicle, for a very part time job? And are those who have such vehicles allowed to use them anytime they want?

The more I learn the more I find this is a pretty good gig you all have going on!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Retired

1:54 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Probably is. The state doesn't typically go back 15-20 years as the story states the charges do. Saying what did a 23 year old kid do versus what did a 43 year old do are very approximations. Although in this situation it appears the councilman did not learn.

james smith

12:52 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

It seems that all of those who have commented on this story are in agreement that we need to do away with county owned vehicles as a job benefit of the councilmen. I think it is time for the people of Baltimore County to start a petition to take the county owned vehicles away from all county councilmen. ALL of the vehicles should be auctioned off and the monies deposited into the county's general funds. Of course, the politicians will then supplement their salaries with automobile expense accounts. That shouls be allowed, but GET RID OF THE COUNTY OWNED VEHICLES!!

Who wants to start the petition?

Reply

LalainMaryland

1:03 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

I fail to see how the actions of 1 councilman is now an indictment on the rest of them. As for the job being part time, I know for a fact that most council members work over 40 hours a week between constituent calls, meetings, emails, hearings, and office hours.

Reply
Comment_arrow

dan ricci

8:00 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

If they work that many hours, how come they get so very little done?

Steve

1:04 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Bah, this is Towson. He will get one of his Elks Lodge buddies as a Judge. They will throw the book at him and then when the hubbub dies down and the press moves on modify the sentence to a PBJ and it will go away.

I just watched it happen to my bosses son with his 7th DUI. He's not even 30 yet.

Reply

Voter

1:30 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Councilman Huff should either resign or somehow be removed from the Council.

This is a disgrace and another example of dispicable behavior by member of Government. If this is how he manages his personal affairs, imagine how well he does on the council.

In my few dealings with his office, he is the least responsive councilman I have ever dealt with.

If he is gone, it would be no great loss.

Reply

TJ

1:36 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Mr. Huff is a complete asshat. He made a LOT of enemies in his district by the ridiculous amount of upzoning he did - despite the overwhelming consensus not to. Unfortunately, he's in bed with the judges for Baltimore County and will probably skip away from these charges with nary a slap on the wrist. Check the public record and note how he upzoned Judge Turnbull's property beautiful farmland could be turned into a bunch of McMansions despite protests from the neighbors, VPC, and environmental groups. There were rumors that Judge Turnbull was his Godfather that had emerged - not sure if there was substance to that rumor or not - but I wouldn't be in the least bit surprised. This guy is about as slippery and slimy as politicians get. The heck with taking away his county-owned wheels, he needs his job taken away. And ALL of us need to stop patronizing Brooks Huff because it just puts more pennies in this idiot's purse! Such a privileged creep...

Reply
Comment_arrow

John Gasparini

10:54 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Tammie, You are not telling the whole story. Many of these so-called "up-zoned" properties have been in peoples families in this area for over 50-60 years. They usually are properties that were down-zoned by previous administrations, depriving families from realizing the profits they have been counting on and have a right. All of the neighbors around Turnbull are living in "Mcmansions" themselves, so they have no right to criticize Huff or Turnbull. Huff has done more to improve the area in one year in office than McIntyre did in 20. This is absolutely reprehensible that he is criticized based on half-inormation. Drinking and driving s wrong, but do juxtapose this egregious act on his legislative record. That is the personification of “asshat”.

Buzz Beeler

2:17 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

There is and old saying, "ya got what ya voted for." In his position running the risk is not a good sign of decision making which is what DUI is all about - decision making. A person makes the choice to get behind he wheel.

It is also a fact that each drink impairs that decision making process. Apparently, based on the time lapse from the last incident there could be a persistent problem.

This lack of elected accountability will never stop until the voters decide to stop it.

Reply

john sullivan

2:18 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Not to mention his totally ignoring the residents of Mays Chapel by taking away their only open space despite overwhelming written facts (presented to him) that it is a terrible idea. Is everyone afraid of kamenetz or is there a reward in their future?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Buzz Beeler

4:39 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

John, just look at the staff and you will find your answer. Moxley, Gardina, just to name two and there are others as well.

pragmatist

2:57 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

It is interesting Mr Huff cites
his previous behavior as "ancient history" as though past behavior in no way predicts future. Tell that to the newly emerging focus groups attempting to define or predict who is stable enough for gun ownership.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Buzz Beeler

4:42 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

"Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it", as the saying goes.

dan ricci

3:00 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

This is a good example why the republican party is known as the "stupid party". But to be balanced, after observing what my councilman Olszewski says and does, the democratic party is the "stupider party". We need all new people in office.

Reply
Comment_arrow

moe green

4:17 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

As opposed to Tom bro well, Jesse Jackson jr, Marion Barry

Comment_arrow

Steve

4:30 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

No, Dick Cheney with his 5 DUI's and Bush with his 3...

Geoffrey Atkinson

3:05 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Drive hammered, get nailed.

Martin O'Malley could tell us all about that!

Reply

dan ricci

3:45 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Yes, he has grown from his past. He has grown a lot worse.

Reply

KWScurti

3:46 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Hmm not a shocker. Another drunk politician representing.

Reply

FIFA_archived

3:53 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Going before the judge and getting his due is one thing.

Explaning to his wife why he was out at 3 in the morning might be tougher.

Reply

Buck Harmon

4:06 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

He was most likely engaged with some of his developer friends, planning the next big re-zoning plan....this is the REAL way that things have historically gotten done in Baltimore County...these meetings must just run long...

Reply

Sam Battle

4:45 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Here is a prime reason why we need a Drunk Driver Registry as we have with sex offenders. BUT it is because of these Annapolis Drunks is why we will never see a drunk driver registry to protect us from them as it would hit them to close to home...DANG Drunks in Annapolis when will one of them hit a family drunk and kill them ..face it as it is only a matter of time when one does and then what...SUPPORT Drunk Driver Registries before it is too late

Reply

Buzz Beeler

5:01 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Now comes the question of his license being suspended. Most lawyers will tell you not to take the test because if the BAC if over the limit that is prima facie evidence of guilt. Other than the probable cause for the stop no other evidence has to be presented if the BAC is .08 or higher.

On the flip side if your refuse to take the test the suspension is longer anywhere from 90 to 180 days depending on the repeat offender issue.

Judging by the photo you can see the glassiness in his eyes which is a key indicator.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Buck Harmon

5:09 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

I don't know Buzz...I've seen cops leave the donut shop with eyes "glazed"..

Fran

5:05 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Sam Battle, I agree. So tired of one set of rules from some and another set of rules for the others. As a legal secretary and a husband that is a former parole officer, this has got to stop...and you know how? We the citizens need to wake up and make a big deal about who we elect and look into their past. Once we see "red flags" such as his, we need to make sure enough people hear about it to make a difference and hopefully influence others not to vote for them. I agree with the Drunk Driver Registry...great idea. f from Perry Hall

Reply

Buzz Beeler

5:15 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

DUI is different than DWI. Driving under the influence vs. driving while intoxicated.

Now there are officers trained in drug detection in those cases where a a person may have a BAC of .00 and still be impaired.

Buck that was a good one on the glazed eyes and doughnuts.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ed

11:44 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Buzz and Buck, a retired trooper I work with says the correct term is "law enforcement power rings" And a retired city officer I work with gave me a law enforcement eyesight chart that is about 30 different kinds of doughnuts!

Jim Arrington

5:21 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Well Todd you finally got caught and I applaud the Police for locking your butt up, the nerve of you to appeal to the Officers for you being drunk to let you go because your a councilman. Your position in the county government does not give you special permission to go get drunk and place citizens in danger of being injured or killed especially with a county car, you are a total jerk and I hope the judge and county government kicks your ass good. You are a drunk so you better get some help as you are a disgrace and should be fired immediately if your fellow members and KK standup to your drunken adventure.

Reply

Sam Battle

5:26 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

CAN MAYBE "PATCH" Help its readers in starting a petition to get a DRUNK DRIVER REGISTRY and help us push it to the right people in Annapolis to get this passed to protect all of us from these Killers...

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tom Sharp

10:17 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

You can get convicted of raping a nun while dealing crack and get that expunged, but you can't get a DUI expunged. No need for more laws about DUIs, just enforcement and a change in public perception about doing it. The laws are already far in excess of what they need to be, particularly after law-makers caved in on the 0.8 so now grandmas can get a DUI for two glasses of wine.

Comment_arrow

Ed

10:33 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Hey tom sharp, depending on the physical make up of the grandmas, don't you think its possible some of them might not be fit to drive after two glasses of wine? Or do you have some sort of background in heath or physiology with some expertise in that area? If they have 2 glasses of wine and can't perform the field sobriety test and blow a .08, then they should not be driving.

Comment_arrow

Tom Sharp

3:34 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

Ed, have you ever seen how little it takes to be over the top for a .08? This standard, even if you can completely pass a field sobriety test, would make you in violation of the DUI law. Hence, laws have been so distorted over the years because every time some new, "cure-all" solution and punishment is brought to the General Assembly, they Assemblymen are too weak kneed to say that what we have is enough. As noted and ignored to go off on a tangent about grandmas, you can get an expungement as a drug dealer, but not for a DUI even if you have never committed another crime before or twenty years later. And, before someone jumps on this in another attempt to pick a fight, attempt to make themselves sound clever and/or holier-than-thou, yes, I am fully aware of the dangers of drinking and driving, but our laws should create rational punishments relative to the crime. Heck, someone convicted of attempted murder can get that expunged. And, I focus on the expungement law because the original post was regarding a Drunk Driver Registry, since I like to actually stick to the topic.

Buzz Beeler

5:29 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Hey Jim, remember when Col. Adams plowed into the rear of that car right down form the old headquarters?

Reply

Dakota Priest

6:03 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

It is so funny, when people in law enforcement, legal law and government immediately start using there power and start saying who they are like they are above us the people who put these candya$$ in office like they will just be let go.

Reply

R Dongarra

7:38 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

The councilman made a terrible mistake that he will pay for but most of the comments are out of line. First he's a conscientious councilman. You may not like his decisions but he researches the issues and listens to his constituients. Agree or disagree he puts in the time and tries to work with everyone. Some who are claiming its a part job ,well please ask to follow them around for a week and tell me how part time it is. You who claim this are either ignorant or ill informed.Im certain he will lose his county car privilges,as he should. He should not resign from the council.he should be very thankful he didn't hurt anyone and move on . This can be a teachable moment. People make mistakes it how you respond to them that matters.

Reply
Comment_arrow

dan ricci

8:07 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

The problem with your reasoning is that he has already committed offenses in the past and has not learned his lesson. He could have killed someone this time. I think he has had enough chances already. He needs to go now.

Comment_arrow

Paul Dongarra

8:35 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Considering my wife, Rebecca Dongarra, was out at the grocery store 42 minutes ago, it's strange that someone is commenting using name. Another sad trick by people who normally use fake names to make rude comments about my family.

Comment_arrow

Ed

11:56 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

whoever you are (if someone hijacked your name), why should Huff be treated any nicer by the patch peanuts than any other suspect who's picture makes it on the site? He's not being treated any worse than the dentist from Phoenix who allegedly pointed a gun in a road rage incident and certainly no better than when the photo of a black suspect pops up on here. But because he's an elected official, the comments are "out of line"? When I see you come to the defense of other suspects on here, I will pay attention. Until then, he may be innocent until proven guilty in the eyes of the law, but in the court of public opinion, he is being held to the same standards as all of the other suspects shown by patch,

Comment_arrow

john sullivan

1:12 am on Sunday, February 24, 2013

R.D.

"....... Listens to his constituants"???? Tell that to 2,500 Mays Chapel residents!!!!!!

Comment_arrow

Ed

1:24 am on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Geez, why can't the posts stick to the issue of an elected official and drunk driving.

Comment_arrow

Donald Bollhorst

11:40 am on Sunday, February 24, 2013

D Bollhorst
An elected official should never make this terrible mistake of driving drunk. He could have killed innocent drivers and familes. Huff should make a statement to the public
that he serves ASAP stating how stupid he was to drive drunk. This is not accusable especially for a public servant who should set a better example.
What is his problem?

Comment_arrow

Parkvillehoney

10:27 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Well Mays Chapel constituants, I hope you remember Todd Huff's decisions when he up for reelection. We need a councilperson that will work for the taxpapyer not for their cronnies.

Comment_arrow

Ed

10:39 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

parkvillehoney, do you mean the deal to put a school on a site that was planned for a school back when Todd Huff was probably still in high school? I don't think he had much of a role with that. That was many county councils, boards of education and county executives ago in partnership with Jim Kellty, the guy who developed Mays Chapel in the first place.

jr

7:47 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Innocent until proven guilty in a court of law

Reply
Comment_arrow

Buck Harmon

7:50 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

He blew more than twice the limit...how can innocence be proven here jr ?

Comment_arrow

jr

8:24 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Reguardless of the test results, this is how our legall system was established. Everyone (no matter who) are always innocent until proven guilty.

Comment_arrow

Buck Harmon

8:33 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Click on the little PDF of the police report and read it... unless the police are outright lying (which may happen from time to time), Huff blew it..! Literally, proven guilty...
You left out the part about in a Court of Law...
Do you believe that Huff is innocent jr ?

Comment_arrow

jr

8:40 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

That is for a judge to decide, not me. As to leaving out "in a court of law" I didnt think i had to re-quote my entire statement.

Comment_arrow

Evets

9:40 am on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Just a note: Failure of a judge or jury to bring back a charge of guilty does not make a person innocent of the charge. It simply means the state did meet its burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Buzz Beeler

7:49 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

R Dongarra, a couple of points that go against the grain of you're argument. First he ran for office. He wanted to be a councilman. Second, the issues he has been involved in have formed a pattern of transgressions through the years. Not a god sign of maturity or ability to deal with issues.

He has made mistakes and not learned how to deal with them. Trust me there are other issues as well that have not been reported. More on that later.

Reply

TJ

7:54 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Re: R Dongarra's comment... "This can be a teachable moment." If this was his first offense, I might fall for that line. But this is not his first offense. Check his public records. And that's just when he wasn't able to talk himself out of the ticket - like I'm sure he tried his darnedest to do early this morning. If he had learned from his first offense, he wouldn't be charged with DUI yet again. He need to resign and sober up before he kills someone.

Reply

Lablover

7:57 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Councilman Tom Quirk said it was a "personal matter" really? Are you kidding me he was in a county vehicle, a new Jeep Grand Cherokee at that. Maybe the council members should have small white compact cars like other county employees have to drive everyday. But there cars would have Baltimore County government license plates and in big letters the words BALTIMORE COUNTY COUNCIL PERSON written on the front, sides, rear, and roof of the cars.

Reply

Buzz Beeler

8:08 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

A .20 is all the state needs to prove guilt. A .20 is almost 3 times the legal limit. That is why you sign your drivers license because you agree to that stipulation of implied consent.

That high of a BAC is not a good sign. At a .40 you will die from alcohol poising. It takes as while to build up that kind of tolerance.

On another issue a DUI registry does not work. We tried that when I was still on the job and we only went after multiple repeat offenders. The numbers are staggering and the time consumed with a limited amount of manpower was useless.

One of the most effective tools is vehicle confiscation of DWI offenders.

Reply

moe green

8:36 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

An outstanding probable course statement

Reply

MD Fan

9:00 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

A couple of huge problems as I see it. First Huff campaigned against all the 'perks' that were enjoyed by McIntyre and other councilmen, but drives a very nice county-owned car that council members can opt out of. Secondly, his statements when he was running that his transgressions were 'ancient history'...well that's not true either. There is also this real arrogance as read in the police report, and the officer was wise in calling her supervisor to the scene. As if by his 'status' he should be given a free pass and driven home, and then to actually call the Chief of Police is really, really offensive behavior. Mr. Huff has much bigger issues than just whether he should finish his term. (like Buzz, I have heard plenty of other 'stories' about this councilman). The 3rd district will survive without him, Mr. Huff, at his age, and possessing that kind of 'above the law' attitude, would be much better advised to focus on his own personal problems first. We live in a forgiving nation. If he can address his problems, and turn his life around, he is still young enough to make a comeback. I do wish him all the best as a person first and foremost.

Reply

DARRELL HAMMERBACKER

9:49 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Sitting on the Baltimore Council with all those Liberal Wackos is enough to make anybody drink

Reply

Frank

10:13 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Hey Buzz and Jim we all know what the outcome will be on Monday the officer will be working pc2 or 12.

Reply

amark

10:38 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

What was the BAC? Also I have seen Huff in the bars where he has fundraisers for his supporters on a couple of occassions. I don't recall him being drunk, but I know he has had some run ins with the law as mentioned in this article. Probably time for him to go.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Buzz Beeler

11:20 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

The BAC was a very high .20. It is no uncommon to see people with a high tolerance for alcohol to act normally.

I once arrested a man who was a .40 (death can occur at that level) and he acted and passed most of the field sobriety test. His tolerance was that high.

Comment_arrow

Buck Harmon

11:20 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

LalainMaryland...sorry, but it is not at all a fact that you or anyone else can prove...
would you care to elaborate or explain your false claim...calling me a liar is a cop out..
like hiding behind a fake name...

Buzz Beeler

11:28 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Frank, no transfers. That would be very foolish for Kamenetz or Johnson to do that. Right now it's not their problem and the police did their job.

If they did step in some way there would be too much political fallout.

MD FAN you are correct there are other issues out there and they are not pretty. The facts must be verified first just to make sure.

Reply

Buck Harmon

11:32 pm on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Kinda makes you wonder who else was at the Elk's Club Party...

Reply
Comment_arrow

Steve

1:44 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

In retrospect, stopping off at Souris Saloon for last call wasn't such a bright idea.

John K

8:13 am on Sunday, February 24, 2013

What scares me is that I see alot of bad drivers that are probably not under the influence.

Reply

Tom Henry

8:45 am on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Getting a quote from the BCRCC Chairman on this issue is like getting swimming lessons from Ted Kennedy.

Reply

AzureSkye

9:02 am on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Amen...I totally agree with you Daughter...I could not have said it better!

Reply

Sam Battle

9:58 am on Sunday, February 24, 2013

"BUZZ"

Your comment " On another issue a DUI registry does not work. We tried that when I was still on the job and we only went after multiple repeat offenders. The numbers are staggering and the time consumed with a limited amount of manpower was useless."

So are you saying that Registries are not the answer ?? Then why are we spending millions on the sex offender registry and TONS of manpower when at a time police depts are short handed. I have heard they have tons of officers on light duty that could handle the work of more registries to help combat crime as the one for sex offenders does. And they claim the sex offender registry is working and sex crimes are down"LOL" Have they read the news lately? If only the public knew the truth about public registries maybe there would be more of them and all CRIME would go to record lows unless we are being lied to by these vote grabbers in Annapolis and or some registries would hit too close to home ?? And did you know the first real sex offender registry was suppose to be for the worse of the worse and now stupid stuff can get you on it for many years to come. So I feel that more is needed to combat crime as we ALL know Law Enforcement on the most part has their hands tied and the other half don't care as long as their paycheck is in their bank on payday.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Buzz Beeler

10:23 am on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Sam, I was the CTAU (Chemical Test for Alcohol Unit) supervisor for 19 years. Our supervisors came up with a plan to go after the worst of the worst and MVA ran the numbers. The result were staggering.

Each precinct was give a list of the offenders in their area. All the information was there. The problem was when you have say a 1,000 offenders and only three officers to monitor them, how do you do that?

The only way is to sit on the house and use surveillance. Now consider that the limited number of officers must handle their other calls for service as well, it became impossible to track these people. You had to first, if you were lucky, catch them on the road. If you did, which could take hours on one case, they would have to have been drinking in order for you to arrest them. Then the courts don't take any action and you are back to square one. Remember these officers also had to handle all their calls on top of this program.

It's like the war on drugs. We lost that a long time ago. The dealers in my area have been locked up so many times and are still out on the streets dealing. I watch it every day.

Some of these offenders had over 10 or more DUI arrests and still had a license and even if they didn't they still drove.

You spoke about the sex offender register list and here are some studies on that.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/08/110830165016.htm

Ken

10:04 am on Sunday, February 24, 2013

The latest reports indicate he will now find jesus , become evangelical and run for president like his George Bush.

In all sincerity it's news because he's a civil servant and I'm glad no one was injured. Don't drink then drive , put the cell phones away while operating vehicles, pay attention to the task at hand.

Reply

Poster2013

10:18 am on Sunday, February 24, 2013

County cars are a taxpayer funded useless expense. If KK wants to be as fiscally responsible as he claims, these should be taken away. As to Mr. Huff, the price of doing business with him is happy hour. Nice enough guy but not exactly a secret that he has a drinking problem, like out almost every night getting pickled. People ignore it because of his position but those in the know, and there are many, know he has a reputation as a foul mouthed alcoholic. Heard a year or so back that he was so drunk at a party that he was screaming obscenities at his staff. Hope he gets into AA and cleans up his life before he gets behind the wheel again. Intervention time for anyone ballsy enough to do it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ed

12:33 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Politically, and perhaps legally, it would be difficult for KK to take cars away for a different branch of elected officials. I'm not sure how the policy is set for cars for council members, but the executive might not have the power to change that.

B. ridge

12:04 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

I can say that this man has had this coming for over a decade. I knew him personally and by the looks of this article and the police report, he hasn't changed a bit or sought help for his drinking problem. I can absolutely hear him saying "Do you know who I am?" because that is the type of cocky man he has always been. Being a councilman was just a power kick to him. I say he should lose his position immediately and sadly, he will probably get a PBJ as it was the first time he was caught and not let go. I put money on it that he's been caught before and just paid off the cop.

Reply

Buzz Beeler

12:47 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

B. Ridge, I can say your are correct in him attempting to use his influence with the police.

There are two more incidents out there yet to be covered. In the one case I was told that he did attempt several times to use that influence. The facts must be verified first.

Reply

Red Dolphin

3:05 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

When Cal Ripken Sr. got pulled over a charged for drinking while driving ( not sure the exact charge) were you all calling for him to be fired by the Orioles ? ( before he even had his day in court?)

Reply
Comment_arrow

Evets

3:12 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Was he driving a taxpayer funded vehicle at the time?

Comment_arrow

Ed

6:04 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Red, I bet people were posting all over the comments section of newspapers when Ripken got his DUI arrest. Oh wait, that was in 1988. There were NO news papers on the internet when that happened. Think maybe you can come up with a more relevant comparison?

moe green

3:05 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

do not hang around an fraternal of police bull roast.
you will see many unmarked poolice cars.

what do you think the poeple have been doing at the bull rpat for 5 hours?

Reply

Buzz Beeler

4:03 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Red, Ripken did not take an oath and work for the taxpayers. Private business is different.

Reply

Sam Battle

4:09 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

BUZZ ::

By reading your link ""You spoke about the sex offender register list and here are some studies on that.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/08/110830165016.htm

It kinda tells the truth that we are being lied to by the fools in annapolis on sex offender laws and more so the registry as study after study has shown it does not in fact work and in many cases causes more issues than it resolves. If this is so true why are we being lied to by those in washington and annnapolis by telling us that this Million even maybe Billion dollar list is working so great or is it just a great vote grabber at the cost of taxpayers.

Reply

Brad

4:46 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

I hope the county council suspends the use of a county car to this councilman who everyone knows will be found Guilty, and given Probation before Judgement, and he will pay a fine, and some type of community service a slap on the hand.
Why should the county tax payers be paying for anyone who has a take home car, who is using it for personal use. Everyone else is paying $3.80 a gallon for gasoline while these politician screw the public with higher taxes, and they drive for free on the county, and the county picks up the car insurance. WOW!!

Reply

Sam Battle

5:10 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

hey BRAD why do you think they do not mind raising the gas taxes all the time as they most likely do not pay for their gas either....WE DO ..win win for them

Reply

jack friese

5:24 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Kamenetz should be required to give "we the people" a listing of all the County take home vehicles, to whom they are assigned to, how much the vehicle cost, how old is it, how many miles and how much does the assigned party pay for personal use. While you at at it Mr. County Executive, let us have the same information for cell phone, usage charge, lap tops and wifi charges. This will give taxpayers an idea of how much we are paying for this stuff. We should know who is driving around in take home vehicles, and this listing should not be limited to the council members, it should include all the individuals who have this perk.

How much does the county spend for Gasoline and diesel every month for these vehicles? Does anyone in County Government know?

If he Kamenetz doesn't provide this information, we should ask for it under the freedom of information provisions.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ed

6:06 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

So Jack, can I ask what is stopping you from making the request? I don't think he is going to give it based on a patch.com comment. If it is that important to you, make the request.

Comment_arrow

Buck Harmon

6:55 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Takes 10 minutes to make the FOI request...that should be the first step..

Varmint

5:52 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Curious that so much time has been invested in expressing opinions. It seems obvious that Mr. Huff has 1. a problem with unearned arrogance and 2. a problem with alcohol and poor judgement. What really concerns me is that attitude that land should not be put into conservation. As the population of this country grows from 3 to 4 to 500 million, one thing will remain fixed (or, worse yet, diminish due to climate change and sea level rise) and that is land. The value of the small amount of remaining open land will increase, often greatly, as people want to live there, yet there won't be much available. When the Valleys Planning Council fought to preserve open space in Greenspring, Caves and the adjoining valleys, in the 70's, what happened to property values there? They skyrocketed. Development has to be curtailed, simply because land owners are very short sighted, with little regard for long term good. Councilman Huff has shown little vision, and an eagerness to destroy what open land remains for quick profits. Conservation requires vision, and we do it for a reason, and that reason is not greed or immediate satisfaction.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ed

6:09 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Varmint, I don't disagree with your thought, but understand that the increase in property values only helps a farmer if he can have the land developed. If he can't sell the land for development, then the restrictions on news housing actually reduces the value of that land.

Comment_arrow

Buck Harmon

6:54 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Placing a dollar value on land preservation does in fact have it's limit's...constraints...
there is a trade off...
The type of development needs to be improved before allowing the next flurry of plastic shack build out..

Comment_arrow

ED

9:38 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

In 2012, Councilman Huff supported County Council Resolution 39-12, a move that helped put North Point Government Center Park up for sale in January.
Dundalk will not have enough open public land if this property is sold for
private redevelopment.
http://www.facebook.com/SaveTheNorthPointGovernmentCenter

Buzz Beeler

5:52 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Sam, there are many reasons why the politicians lie. The biggest reason is accountability. They want to stay in power and will do just about anything to achieve that. The public is uninformed and apathetic, two bad combinations.

The last primary in Baltimore County was one of the lowest on record. My best guess is that his problem will stem from the fact this is his first term and this kind of event will not endear him to his constituents. He does not have the longevity and if challenged by a possible contender, I think he will lose.

As for the sex offender problem, it lies in the hands of the system. Same as DWI's; it's the repeat offenders that constitute the problem.

It's a simple fact the longer the bad guys stay in jail the lower the crime rate. The city's homicide rate involves 80% who are repeat offenders according to the Sun.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Buck Harmon

7:00 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

The jailing industry has it's own host of problems Buzz...a major one being the private corporation profits that thrive at taxpayer expense...above and beyond the cost to house and care for inmates....the kind that has political ties..you know what I mean..

Comment_arrow

Evets

7:32 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Mr. Beeler, I disagree. The public is not uninformed. There are plenty of sources for information regarding what our elected officials are doing or are proposing to do, Any ignorance on the part of citizens is willful ignorance. Too much time spent watching Survivor on TV and checking Facebook and texts to pay attention to the world around them.

Comment_arrow

Ed

7:37 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Evets, they are still uninformed if they are willfully ignorant. If they don't seek out the information, they still are uninformed.

Comment_arrow

Evets

9:10 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Ed, that is true enough.

Buck Harmon

6:57 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Do you think that Huff follows these blogs...?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ed

7:19 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Buck, depends on if he has gotten any political advice from Richard Rothschild :-)

Comment_arrow

Ed

7:55 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Thought you'd appreciate that, Buck.

Buzz Beeler

8:52 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Evets, go into the local grocery story and ask several people who their councilman is or what district they live in or any political or history question.

If you remember I stated in the last primary we had one of the lowest turnouts in the states history.

This link may convince you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_pw8duzGUg

Or how about this one:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h8I30k3ChKw

Or this one:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Url1HL6oExk

That is why we are ranked poorly in the areas in science and math among developed nations.. The sad part is that these people are the future of this nation.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Evets

9:09 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Even more interesting is that staffing and class time for government and civics classes in our public schools are being reduced more each year.

Buzz Beeler

8:59 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Buck they all follow these blogs and you can take that to the bank. I'm sure he is or will read how the people think.

Reply

Momof1

1:32 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

I speak with these people several times a month and can tell who cares and who doesn't. That is in fact sad. As far as this incident, only with Councilman Huff. I agree he be treated like any other "normal" citizen should be treated and if he doesn't like the judge at the District Court, he can pray a jury trial and get a hearing in the Circuit Court and hope for better. This is the part that is unfortnate. He WILL pray a Jury Trial, he will leave the disposition up to whomever judge and ofcourse not a jury. I say he gets PBJ, a fine, and that's that. BUT I believe the Judge should send him to a 28 week alcohol education program, require interlock be installed in all vehicles (including county) AND with that interlock being installed in the said County vehicle, it is our councilpersons responsibility to pay for the installation and maintenance on it. And after this, I love the idea that a "committee" be established (which I'll look into) to actuallty do backgrounds inc. MVA... Hey, I need a new job and I'll head the committee, don't need a car...I'll be good lol. But, after the conviction, I still see him in office unless he is demanded to resign by KK. So sad and I truly, from living with someone with a problem, I truly, hope and pray that he gets treatment for himself and for his family. That alone would be the rising out of the ashes from his actual "personal matter." Sorry, just threw some points and ideas out didn't mean to feel like I was at work!

Reply

Scott in Towson

5:26 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

Republicans are shamefully embarrassing hypocrites for calling for GOP Councilman Todd Huff to stay in office when he ought to be tried, convicted and put in prison. IS THREE TIMES FOR DUI NOT ENOUGH FOR A COUNCILMAN, MUCH LESS ANYONE TO BE FREE TO DRIVE OUR ROADS DRUNK SO AS TO INJURE OR KILL OTHER DRIVERS?????

How sick! How sad! No wonder the GOP isn't a real political party in Maryland or Baltimore County. Had this been a Democrat, the right-wing tea partiers would be calling for him to resign immediately and then: 'off with his head." Mere hypocrites from the SO-CALLED "FAMILY VALUES" PARTY! Live up to this one, GOP!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tom Henry

8:20 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

As soon as you Dems live up to getting rid of Ken Oliver, a CONVICTED criminal.

Comment_arrow

james smith

1:10 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

You put all Republicans into your cute little catagory so you can persecute them and yell about how wonderful Democrats are. Get a life!!

I am a conservative Republican. I don't think there are any Republican politicians in the state of Maryland, only Democrats with the letter "R" after their last name.

Mr. Huff needs to be punished. He should have had his driver's license taken away from him long ago. Having been almost hit by a drunk driver three times in my short life, I feel very strongly about this. I don't know what is wrong with the officials in this state because I have seen many people with traffic violations have their license taken away, yet many people with DUIs or DWIs never have their license taken away. What his punishments should be besides revocation of his license I cannot say. I question whether taxpayers should pay to keep him in prison. If he is smart enough to be on the county council, maybe he could do a couple thousand hours of community service for us. Community service such as tutoring and mentoring, not cleaning floors.

And NO ONE who works for Baltimore Country needs cars supplied by the taxpayers, certainly not Jeep Grand Cherokees!! Baltimore County, or any other local government, should not be giving any employees cars to take home!! Remember folks, all of this crap is paid for by our property taxes, which are already outrageously high!!

jack friese

7:52 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

I wonder who else except perhaps Steve Whalen is going to contribute to this shake down? google Kevin Kamenetz and this pops us. Wow!
Join Us Thursday, April 4, 2013
Valley Mansion: 594 Cranbrook Road Hunt Valley, MD 21030

VIP Reception: 5:30 p.m. -6:30 p.m., $4000 per ticket
Host Reception: 6:30 p.m.-7:00 p.m., $1000 per ticket
Guest Reception: 7:00 p.m. – 8:30 p.m., $150 per ticket
Official Baltimore County Executive Website »
Official Website of The Baltimore County Executive Office »
Official Baltimore County Website »
Subscribe to the County Connection E-Newsletter »
This official Baltimore County e-newsletter is designed to keep you informed about what is happening around our county with updates sent twice per month.
Official Baltimore County Executive Facebook Page »

I want to thank all of the people who support me on our campaign's Facebook page, and I'd like to invite you to join us by Liking the official County Executive Facebook page

Reply
Comment_arrow

Buck Harmon

8:43 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

Think of it in terms of a screw...all depends on which end of the screw you reside...
The pointy tip with the finest or smallest threads always gets buried the deepest..
While the fat threads with more pull are at the top of the shank...still screwed, but just under the head....question is , do you prefer a straight slot screw or the double cross phillip head screwing...?

Comment_arrow

Buck Harmon

8:45 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

Oh...and is booze served at the reception too..?

Comment_arrow

FIFA_archived

1:28 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

@PHP - what you are missing is the following. What if that $4,000 is viewed as an investment? Will it give me a chance to earn many times that by paying and going on many more than just one vacation?

@Buck - it better be just like at all of the other fundraisers.

Brad

9:02 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

Buzz: you would know this, how many supervisors in the police dept have take home cars? How many of these supervisors live out of Baltimore County, such as Carroll County, Westminister, Harford County, Anne Arundel County and in Pennsylvania? Sergeants & Lieutenants in specialize units and Captains, Majors have take home cars. These supervisors have access to these take home vehicles and drive these vehicles to and from work. Some are seen at Raven games, and Orioles games. With gas prices this high, why should the Baltimore County tax payers be paying for a free ride & insurance for these supervisors? Why can't they drive their personal vehicle to their place of employment, and then drive their duty vehicle from their duty assignment? Other people are taking the bus, or driving their own cars to their place of employment. It would be a good idea to have a public list, listing all the people who have take home cars including Baltimore County Council, we should know what type of mileage is being put on these vehicles, and what it is costing the Baltimore Tax payers.

Reply
Comment_arrow

moe green

3:50 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

does corporal al friedman still take the marked suburban home to carroll county?
is he still on the job?

Comment_arrow

Buzz Beeler

4:44 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

Brad, I could be wrong but I think the take home cars go to captains and above and some Lt.'s like homicide and tact. Tact officers also have vehicles. The list may include the PIO (Public Information Officer), burglary detectives and homicide detectives.

In order to be exact I would need to file a PIA as many times even though it's public information they will ignore you. You can't ignore a PIA.

jack friese

9:30 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

I just got off the phone with Julie, from the Baltimore County Department of Human Resources (410 887 3135). She was very polite. When I told her I wanted to file a freedom of information request, she asked for the subject. When I told her I wanted to find out how much these county vehicles, computers, cell phone and wi fi devices for the seven council representatives are costing Maryland taxpayers, she politely said, "I will have to transfer you to the law department". I asked her if the law department had an email address, she said, "I have to transfer you to the law department, at which time I said, "thanks I'll send an email to Kamenetz", and I will sometime today. If anyone is interested in contacting Kamenetz, his email address is: Kevin@baltimorecountymd.gov.

Someone in the County Government must be held accountable for this debacle and outrageous expense that taxpayers are picking up on this boondoggle. Mr. Kamenetz please tell me to whom I should send this freedom of information request. My email address is dumbcastle1@gmail.com. I'll be looking forward to hearing from your law department or you Mr. Kamenetz! thank you!

How many citizens knew that council members are provided a County Car, gas etc? I'll bet very few.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Buck Harmon

9:58 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

Jack, In Baltimore County you should file a PIA request ..that's the MD specific statute that functions the same as the Freedom of Information Act request.
I called the County Attorney, Mike Field, and while he was there he was not available to speak to me. I did however speak to a very nice attorney that works for him, Ashley Hoffmeister..A letter or Email to the Budget office and the Executive office would probably be the quickest way to obtain the information. The must respond with an answer to your request and I'm told that,that answer usually includes the info being sought. Kamenetz office email would most likely stall or actually slow the process a bit...for some reason. law office # 410-887-4420

Edward Kimmel

9:37 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

The line that took me back to my days as a municipal prosecutor (in Oklahoma) was where he informed the officer that "You stopped me on my own property." Most of the people who contested traffic stops were either innocent or had some folksy / urban legend of a defense, like "if I make it to my own driveway before the police can arrest me, I'm innocent." I had one guy lead them on a high speed chase that ended with him jumping the curb into his front yard in order to make that defense.
(It didn't work then, either.)

Reply

Buzz Beeler

10:40 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

Jack, I'll get back to you on those issues. Use my e-mail, buzz@buzzbeeler.com

Reply

Jim Arrington

11:45 am on Monday, February 25, 2013

Buzz I sure do, him being the deputy Chief and drinking his usual liquid lunch he crashed the cop car into the rear of another at York and Ridgely lolllllllllllll another jerk

Reply

Duane G. Davis

2:32 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

He gonna walk away Just like Carl Snowden did wanna bet? Still on the Job an d collecting a county Check..He might be driving a county car as we post.

Reply

moe green

4:50 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

How about we strip huff of his citizenship, excommunicate him and throw him into loch raven naked. Will that satisfy everyone before his trial?

What he did was stupid and irresponsible for anyone. But he deserves a trial and is presumed innocent.
It is up to the voters in his district to decide if they want him to represent him on the council

Reply

Buzz Beeler

4:54 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

Moe, Al was reassigned to the Truck Squad. He as a corporal was in charge of Traffic Management when I was there. He was replaced by a sergeant who now takes home the SUV.

The supervisor of TM is involved in any major highway event in the county. This could be anything from road closures due to crashes or parades and funerals.

So instead of a corporal running the show, it's now a sergeant who answers to the captain.

Support Operations consist of Traffic Management, K-9, the truck safety unit and TACT along with the school guards and abandoned auto unit to the best of my memory.

Reply

honey

12:02 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Why in the world do the taxpayers of Baltimore County have to provide a vehicle for any councilman?
How many other counties are using taxpayer funds so the councilman can drive around in a shiney new car?
This is totaly a misuse of funds. .........and should stop immediately

Reply

Ed

3:27 pm on Tuesday, February 26, 2013

honey, I suspect most counties give their councils access to cars for county business; not sure if any others give them cars to use full time. Also, from this article, there is no way to know if it's "shiney new".

Reply

bob sagget

3:13 am on Friday, March 1, 2013

That "Luxury" Jeep you all are so concerned about is a hand-me-down.. A former unmarked police vehicle, with a LOT of police miles on it (those are worse than teenager miles).

Reply

Buzz Beeler

8:45 am on Friday, March 1, 2013

bob, what difference does that make? It is still dangerous and we paid for it and it shows - once again - poor leadership skills in his decision making process.

Reply

Buck Harmon

8:49 am on Friday, March 1, 2013

The perks seem to violate the spirit of public service at this level...very odd indeed.

Reply

johnhouser38

11:47 pm on Wednesday, April 10, 2013

Certainly, it's a tough to deal with DUI or DWI legal cases. It might lead you to many adverse outcomes and it should not be considered casually. Implications of DWI and DUI legal cases might involve settlement of massive fees, mandatory use of ignition interlock gadget, cancellation of license, incarceration and community service.

<a href="http://newyorkcityduilawyer.us.com/">new york city dwi lawyer</a>

Reply

Leave a comment