Baltimore County Board of Education Delays Vote on Changes to Facilities Use Policy
School board also elects new officers.
After five months of debate, members of the Baltimore County Board of Education moved Tuesday to further study proposed changes to the school system's facilities use policy.
The issue has been before the school board since February when county residents spoke out in opposition to the policy because strict enforcement had banned events like PTA craft fairs and long-standing community events from being held at public school buildings.
At Tuesday's meeting, board members received a spreadsheet of more than 60 comments on the issue.
The board's policy committee had reviewed the policy known as Rule 1300 in the past few months and changes were brought back to the entire board in June. After the proposed changes were introduced, members of the public were invited to give feedback to the school board during board meeetings or in email through the system's website.
Some parents who were there to testify at the meeting Tuesday said they are concerned that any further delay will jeopardize events planned for the upcoming school year.
Leslie Weber, the past president of the PTA of Loch Raven High School, said that because the policy is still in limbo some applications for events that were denied will have no chance of appeal unless the changes go through.
"Summer is planning time for PTAs," she said.
Board members said they needed more time to digest all of the feedback from the public in order to make the right revisions to the policy.
Also at Tuesday's meeting, the board recognized past members Earnest Hines and Meg O'Hare, whose terms ended this month. New members Michael J. Collins and Cornelia Bright Gordon started their terms on the board.
The board also elected new officers, with Lawrence E. Schmidt being elected as president and Valerie A. Roddy being elected as vice president. Schmidt was elected unanimously and Roddy was selected over James E. Coleman, who was also nominated for the position.
Concerned Citizen
9:45 am on Wednesday, July 13, 2011
Maybe they'll reconsider the policy. You don't bite the hand that feeds you. PTAs work only to benefit the children and the schools.
Bonnie Wesselhoff
10:43 am on Wednesday, July 13, 2011
Unfortunately this school board has shown itself to be unresponsive to not only parents but nonresponsive to the PTSA as well. I would like to see the BoE explain how this Rule 1300 benefits the families of BCPS and how it is in alignment with it's mission statment which can be found on page 5 at- http://www.bcps.org/offices/super/pdf/blueprint-for-progress.pdf
Mike Pierce
3:27 pm on Wednesday, July 13, 2011
What is really sad is that when the original draft revision of the Policy was presented to the Board on May 24 for its "first reading", board members expressed the need for a number of changes and members of the public submitted written comments and spoke at the June 14 Board meeting, yet the School personnel presented absolutely the same copy at the July 12 meeting for approval. They did not change a single character after all that effort. Luckily, the Board is demanding that the comments be addressed. Unfortunately, this leaves a lot of programs for the fall in limbo, unless the school officials see the light and apply the current policy correctly.
William Lutostanski Jr
9:55 am on Thursday, July 14, 2011
These schools are built with public money. The PTA's at the very least should have access to the buildings for fundraising events. I would take it a step futher and say that, if interest is there, why not rent out the buildings and bring money back into the system. Why have a building sit idle doing nothing when it could be performing a function and maybe even generate a profit. This is a silly rule and its time for the school system and county goverment to start thinking outside the box.